Mystery Of Mona Nelsons Alleged Role As A Murderer

Mona Nelson is one of the worst killers in America. The murder of a young boy on Christmas Eve in 2010 remains a haunting reminder of the evil that can exist in this world. 

The death of the 12-year-old boy shocked the community and sparked an intense investigation to bring the culprit to justice. 

Despite the efforts of law enforcement, the case remains shrouded in mystery and doubt. However, one person has been at the center of the investigation – Mona Nelson.

Mona Nelson, who was accused of killing the young boy, has been fighting to clear her name since the day she was charged.

Despite the accusations, her attorney, Allen Tanner, vehemently maintains that there is no concrete evidence connecting her to the crime. 

In fact, Tanner believes that it would be a travesty to sentence Nelson to life in prison without thoroughly examining all the evidence and exploring other possible suspects.

According to Tanner, there are no forensic clues or physical evidence linking Nelson to the crime, and it would be a massive mistake to ignore this fact.

He quickly points out that just because Nelson may have been near the crime scene, it does not make her the murderer. He believes that other individuals may be involved, and the true culprit is still waiting to be caught.

As per the state laws, if Mona Nelson is convicted of the crime, she will be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

The prosecution is not seeking the death penalty. Despite repeated assertions from investigators and prosecutors that they believed Nelson was responsible for the young boy’s death, Spence finally offered a theory about the motive behind the crime.

Spence revealed that Nelson had visited a friend named Sharon Ennamorato, who worked at a restaurant in North Houston, after drinking that day.

Ennamorato and the boy’s mother were temporarily sharing the apartment and Nelson was told to wait there for Ennamorato’s return. Spence claimed that Ennamorato was supposed to call the boy tasked with keeping everyone out, but she failed to do so.

According to Spence, when Nelson arrived at the apartment at 2 PM, she discovered that the boy wouldn’t let her in. She then took the boy several miles away to her house, where she bound and killed him.

Spence told the judge that Nelson burned the boy’s body with a cutting torch used by welders, which belonged to Nelson, and had four hours to do it.

When the boy’s burned body was found in a ditch in North Houston, security footage showed Nelson’s truck being used to dump the body.

Nelson admitted to the police that it was her pickup truck, but the boy’s estranged stepfather was also in the vehicle. He had asked Nelson for help in getting rid of a garbage can. Spence stated that Nelson dumped the body like it was garbage.

What did the security footage reveal?

After reviewing the security footage, which showed the boy’s stepfather consuming alcohol at a bar during the time of his disappearance, the police cleared him of any involvement in the crime.

Approximately an hour prior to the boy’s disappearance, Nelson confirmed having a conversation with him at the apartment where he lived with his mother and a friend at 12 Oak St. in northwest Houston. Nelson said she left the premises alone after speaking with the boy at the door.

Final verdict

The case of Mona Nelson and the murder of the young boy remains a complicated and emotional issue with many unanswered questions.

However, what is clear is that Allen Tanner is committed to fighting for Nelson’s rights and ensuring that justice is served correctly. Regardless of the outcome, he is determined to see that the truth is uncovered and the right person is held accountable.

In conclusion, the young boy’s death remains a heart-wrenching tragedy, and the search for justice continues.

While the accusations against Mona Nelson are serious, her attorney, Allen Tanner, is confident that there is no evidence linking her to the crime.

He believes that it would be a catastrophic mistake to send her to prison without thoroughly investigating all the evidence and exploring all possibilities.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7t7XZmpqaZpOkunC5zqeYZqaVocCwuoymrKuclaeys3s%3D